GNU Social Club
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Notices tagged with rms

  1. Thunder Beaver (thndrbvr@gnusocial.club)'s status on Saturday, 27-Jun-2020 08:47:31 UTC Thunder Beaver Thunder Beaver
    http://techrights.org/2020/06/22/corporate-fsf/
    Summary: “Who’s going to defend our 4 freedoms then? The people who bribed the watchdogs? The people who decapitated our organisations?”

    #fsf #gnu #Mozilla #watchdogs #freesoftware #RMS
    In conversation about 7 months ago from web permalink

    Attachments

    1. The Implications of an Increasingly Corporate FSF
      "Who's going to defend our 4 freedoms then? The people who bribed the watchdogs? The people who decapitated our organisations?"
  2. zig 🌑🌱 (zig@functional.cafe)'s status on Monday, 27-Apr-2020 23:23:22 UTC zig 🌑🌱 zig 🌑🌱
    Remote profile options...

    I need again to speak about #guile #guix, #gnu and #fsf.

    The so called #GnuSocialContract is misleading.

    Go read the document: https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract

    First thing, 80% of the document (dubbed "contract" for some reason) is old stuff.

    Re 4 freedoms: those do not reflect the world socioeconomic needs. In particular, giving the freedom to ANYONE to run the program, for ANY PURPOSE: is socially counter-productive. Economically speaking, it would help the world strive if / when more #diversity happens, more exchange and curation of ideas (that was dubbed noise by a gnu maintainer), instead of giving more power to the powerful. **The gnu license, give more power to the powerful.**

    Re second paragraph about a consistent system: that is full garbage. I guess, it is in the document, to rule out "inconsistent". Who decide what is consistent? #rms?! It is more food for establishment trolls.

    Re 3rd paragraph: collaborate with the broader free software community: there is two idea "collaborate" instead of "cooperate". I leave the exercise to the reader to read what historically "collaboration" means at least in #Europe. Second idea: "free software", that continues to hijack the definition of "free" and "freedom" to what gnu/fsf/lawyers decide is free (but not gratis #meme).

    The last paragraph, is somewhat something like the pseudo-kind community guidelines. Here is it in full:

    > The GNU Project welcomes contributions from all and everyone>> The GNU Project **commits to providing a harassment-free** experience for all contributors. It wants to give everyone the opportunity of contributing to **its efforts** on any of the many tasks that require work. It welcomes all contributors, regardless of their gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal characteristics.

    GNU wants to trick you into thinking that it is "kind", giving the definition of kindness.

    In conversation about 9 months ago from functional.cafe permalink

    Attachments

    1. gnu:social-contractfirst [Wiki for GNU Maintainers]
  3. shamar@qoto.org's status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2019 10:50:14 UTC Shamar Shamar
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to
    • some dude

    @dthompson

    Mind to define "positive change"?

    For example I would consider very positive if #GNU becomes less and less welcoming to #US corporate #hypocrisy.

    Actually we should look for the #weirdest people to join, as #RMS is not #weird enough to me.

    ____

    BTW, are you going to block/mute me too?Beware: I'm not from the #US?I dare to be #Italian!

    ____

    Sorry for the #sarcasm, but I've found this https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ as a political abuse against my people.

    You are marginalizing #hackers because they are weird.

    You joint a mob lynching #RMS for what he said, forgetting that #software is a form of human expression, so #FreeSoftware IS #FreeSpeech.

    In conversation about a year ago from qoto.org permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
  4. Dr. Roy Schestowitz (罗伊) (schestowitz@joindiaspora.com)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Nov-2019 05:17:15 UTC Dr. Roy Schestowitz (罗伊) Dr. Roy Schestowitz (罗伊)
    Remote profile options...

    The Only Person Punished for the #BillGates - #Epstein Connection/Affairs Seems to be #RichardStallman and Now the Libel Resumes http://techrights.org/2019/11/06/sacrificing-rms-for-mit/ #rms #mit

    In conversation about a year ago from joindiaspora.com permalink

    Attachments

    1. The Only Person Punished for the Gates-Epstein Connection/Affairs Seems to be Richard Stallman and Now the Libel Resumes
      The media that caused Dr. Stallman to lose his place at MIT and also at the FSF (which he had founded) still libels him, having just — yet again — wrongly asserted that Stallman “defended” the person whom he actually called “serial rapist”
  5. Lohan G (lohang@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2019 11:25:30 UTC Lohan G Lohan G
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to

    The abrupt resignation of #RMS is a victory to the big brother. It leaves a political vacuum that those who applaud the resignation can never, and will never fill.

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
  6. Lohan G (lohang@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2019 11:25:30 UTC Lohan G Lohan G
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to

    ... those who were at the receiving end of his scathing criticism of surveillance state/surveillance capitalism. #RMS has been an outspoken defendant of #Wikileaks, Julian #Assange, Chelsea #Manning and Edward #Snowden.

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
  7. Lohan G (lohang@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2019 11:25:30 UTC Lohan G Lohan G
    Remote profile options...

    A Thread In Defense of Richard Stallman #RMS

    The identity politics crowd / #metoo lobby destroyed Richard Stallman with the support of corporate media and many others. Among those who applaud will be tech giant companies, opponents of software freedom and most importantly, ...

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
  8. Lohan G (lohang@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2019 11:25:29 UTC Lohan G Lohan G
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to

    How can this go unchallenged? This is a campaign that bends and stretches facts in the most surreal way. The principal rule that has been applied against #RMS is "anything goes". The similarities this has to the witch-hunt against Jacob Appelbaum are astonishing!

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
  9. Lohan G (lohang@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2019 11:25:29 UTC Lohan G Lohan G
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to

    Soon, they will start packaging it in combination with attacks against his resolute defense of software freedom, opposition to the surveillance state and US-lead imperialist war drive around the world. Those who replace him will undermine what #RMS stood for, politically.

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
  10. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:32:59 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to
    • FSFE
    • Se7en
    • Rui Seabra
    @se7en @RuiSeabra @fsfe you mean link:https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/index.html#gnu #rms #fsfFree software movement is getting corrupted. Support apolitical GNU and defend free speech rights.Refrain from defamation people! Refrain from online lynching and slander people!#FSFE is to loose number of supporters, but now they are financially strong enough to be able to depart from the original free software philosophy.
    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink
  11. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:29:56 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to
    • FSFE
    • Se7en
    • Rui Seabra
    @se7en @RuiSeabra @fsfe put links with facts, links that clearly state what are facts. Facts:https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UbQ1kc1vQUMy Thoughts on the Richard Stallman "Scandal" by Jacobhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGF17TbbBcEHow does Dr. Richard Stallman lead GNU Project?Dr. Richard Stallman contacts opinion leaders and forwards free software:https://www.zdnet.com/article/free-software-advocate-richard-stallman-spoke-at-microsoft-research-this-week/He teaches the world on free software:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCh8EcBrptDr. Richard Stallman provides policies and planning for GNU project, and he has done so successfuly for many years.And Minsky is not guilty, finally accusing dead person is disgraceful:https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/339725/True free software philosophy supporters defend #GNU and defends #RMS
    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink
  12. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 16:39:47 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to
    • FSFE
    • boldsuck
    @boldsuck @fsfe that is rumor mongering there are many facts on #RMS, and what he said outside of the #FSF and #GNU project is his own opinion. Nobody shall be punished for Thoughtcrime, especially not by #FSFE people who shall respect free speech and democracy. FSFE is not working by democratic principles and is thus prone to inspection by German Vereinsgesetz -- they are bullies.Response on Medium:https://medium.com/@tossing.bark/remove-stallman-you-say-and-everyone-else-horrible-in-tech-fd4b1446b0a1My Thoughts on the Richard Stallman "Scandal" by Jacobhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGF17TbbBcEHow does Dr. Richard Stallman lead GNU Project?Dr. Richard Stallman contacts opinion leaders and forwards free software:https://www.zdnet.com/article/free-software-advocate-richard-stallman-spoke-at-microsoft-research-this-week/He teaches the world on free software:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCh8EcBrptADr. Richard Stallman provides policies and planning for GNU project, and he has done so successfuly for many years.And Minsky is not guilty, finally accusing dead person is disgraceful:https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/339725/Facts:https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/https://geoff.greer.fm/2019/09/30/in-defense-of-richard-stallman/https://fsforce.noblogs.org/https://backtotheaugust.org/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UbQ1kc1vQU or https://watchkin.com/y/7UbQ1kc1vQUhttps://www.change.org/p/the-gnu-project-action-proposal-to-joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project-485e8f9a-1505-40c0-89b4-582a4f0e8288
    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink
  13. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 16:32:56 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...
    in reply to
    • FSFE
    • Max Mehl
    • Lioh
    @mxmehl @lioh @fsfe Do not imply that #RMS is discriminating anybody, it is not true. That is rumor mongering factory.
    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink
  14. louis (louis@gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 16:30:13 UTC louis louis
    • MediaHobgoblin
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime
    https://gnusocial.club/url/217406

    Defend #gnu, #fsf #rms and ask FSF to remove defamatory statement of Ludovic Courtès and other brutus.

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Ludovic Courtès

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing."

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement "that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to." -- as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer "which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users".

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    Do I bash Guix and Ludovic Courtès for their free speech? NO!

    Not at all.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    But what I find really embarassing and disgraceful and immature act that Ludovic Courtès is publishing such defamation on RMS on RMS's GNU.ORG domain!

    What I find embarassing, and not appropriate is that Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg and John W. Eaton are participating in defamation of character of Richard Stallman on his own domain GNU.ORG.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    And I cannot find any trace if they ever asked RMS what is actually going on. As of 2019-10-09 they have not shown adult logic to verify what is going on, they simply participate in rumours and create hatred, animosity and enmity.

    It is not the RMS. Those people are now using GNU website to undermine the GNU project. They are doing more harm than good.
    In conversation about a year ago from web at 0°0'0"S 0°0'0"W permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  15. louis (louis@gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 16:30:07 UTC louis louis
    • GNU Social
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime
    https://gnusocial.club/url/217406

    Defend #gnu, #fsf #rms and ask FSF to remove defamatory statement of Ludovic Courtès and other brutus.

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Ludovic Courtès

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing."

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement "that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to." -- as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer "which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users".

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    Do I bash Guix and Ludovic Courtès for their free speech? NO!

    Not at all.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    But what I find really embarassing and disgraceful and immature act that Ludovic Courtès is publishing such defamation on RMS on RMS's GNU.ORG domain!

    What I find embarassing, and not appropriate is that Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg and John W. Eaton are participating in defamation of character of Richard Stallman on his own domain GNU.ORG.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    And I cannot find any trace if they ever asked RMS what is actually going on. As of 2019-10-09 they have not shown adult logic to verify what is going on, they simply participate in rumours and create hatred, animosity and enmity.

    It is not the RMS. Those people are now using GNU website to undermine the GNU project. They are doing more harm than good.
    In conversation about a year ago from web at 0°0'0"S 0°0'0"W permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  16. louis (louis@gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 16:30:03 UTC louis louis
    • GNU Emacs and Emacs Lisp
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime
    https://gnusocial.club/url/217406

    Defend #gnu, #fsf #rms and ask FSF to remove defamatory statement of Ludovic Courtès and other brutus.

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Ludovic Courtès

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing."

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement "that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to." -- as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer "which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users".

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    Do I bash Guix and Ludovic Courtès for their free speech? NO!

    Not at all.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    But what I find really embarassing and disgraceful and immature act that Ludovic Courtès is publishing such defamation on RMS on RMS's GNU.ORG domain!

    What I find embarassing, and not appropriate is that Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg and John W. Eaton are participating in defamation of character of Richard Stallman on his own domain GNU.ORG.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    And I cannot find any trace if they ever asked RMS what is actually going on. As of 2019-10-09 they have not shown adult logic to verify what is going on, they simply participate in rumours and create hatred, animosity and enmity.

    It is not the RMS. Those people are now using GNU website to undermine the GNU project. They are doing more harm than good.
    In conversation about a year ago from web at 0°0'0"S 0°0'0"W permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  17. louis (louis@gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 16:29:55 UTC louis louis
    • BonoboNET
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime
    https://gnusocial.club/url/217406

    Defend #gnu, #fsf #rms and ask FSF to remove defamatory statement of Ludovic Courtès and other brutus.

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Ludovic Courtès

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing."

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement "that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to." -- as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer "which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users".

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    Do I bash Guix and Ludovic Courtès for their free speech? NO!

    Not at all.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    But what I find really embarassing and disgraceful and immature act that Ludovic Courtès is publishing such defamation on RMS on RMS's GNU.ORG domain!

    What I find embarassing, and not appropriate is that Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg and John W. Eaton are participating in defamation of character of Richard Stallman on his own domain GNU.ORG.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    And I cannot find any trace if they ever asked RMS what is actually going on. As of 2019-10-09 they have not shown adult logic to verify what is going on, they simply participate in rumours and create hatred, animosity and enmity.

    It is not the RMS. Those people are now using GNU website to undermine the GNU project. They are doing more harm than good.
    In conversation about a year ago from web at 0°0'0"S 0°0'0"W permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  18. louis (louis@gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 16:29:18 UTC louis louis
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime
    https://gnusocial.club/url/217406

    Defend #gnu, #fsf #rms and ask FSF to remove defamatory statement of Ludovic Courtès and other brutus.

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Ludovic Courtès

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: "The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing."

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement "that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to." -- as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer "which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users".

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    Do I bash Guix and Ludovic Courtès for their free speech? NO!

    Not at all.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    But what I find really embarassing and disgraceful and immature act that Ludovic Courtès is publishing such defamation on RMS on RMS's GNU.ORG domain!

    What I find embarassing, and not appropriate is that Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus, Matt Lee, Andreas Enge, Samuel Thibault, Carlos O'Donell, Andy Wingo, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, Mark Wielaard, Ian Lance Taylor, Werner Koch, Daiki Ueno, Christopher Lemmer Webber, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, John Wiegley, Tom Tromey, Jeff Law, Han-Wen Nienhuys, Joshua Gay, Ian Jackson, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Andrej Shadura, Zack Weinberg and John W. Eaton are participating in defamation of character of Richard Stallman on his own domain GNU.ORG.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    And I cannot find any trace if they ever asked RMS what is actually going on. As of 2019-10-09 they have not shown adult logic to verify what is going on, they simply participate in rumours and create hatred, animosity and enmity.

    It is not the RMS. Those people are now using GNU website to undermine the GNU project. They are doing more harm than good.
    In conversation about a year ago from web at 0°0'0"S 0°0'0"W permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  19. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 08:03:01 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...
    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime

    URL: https://gnu.support/richard-stallman/Ludovic-Courtès-Guix-is-accusing-Stallman-of-Thoughtcrime-on-his-own-domain-GNU-org.html

    #gnu #fsf #rms

    Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984).

    By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses the Guix code of conduct and the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines as set in the community by Richard Stallman himself.

    Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019. His disgraceful statement was published on https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ whereby no prior Guix discussion have taken place. How did those people get together to publish such statement? There are no references that I could find on the Guix mailing lists.

    It is in contradiction to GNU Kind Communication Guidelines: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html where by it says: “The only political positions that the GNU Project endorses are (1) that users should have control of their own computing (for instance, through free software) and (2) supporting basic human rights in computing.”

    My domain gnu.support is not connected or sponsored by FSF, neither it is part of GNU project. It is there to publish my opinions or maybe opinions of other people, I am welcoming opinions on every page of this domain.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to state the facts that will prove and evidence their statement “that Stallman’s behavior over the years has undermined a core value of the GNU project: the empowerment of all computer users. GNU is not fulfilling its mission when the behavior of its leader alienates a large part of those we want to reach out to.” — as such statement is baseless, fact-less, pure generalization and rumour.

    References to his answers can be found on 2019-10-07 IRC log and 2019-10-08 IRC log. This same log is not accessible as of 2019-10-09 (504 Gateway Time-out). This page will be updated.

    Yet, Ludovic Courtès, is asking people to join him in such nonsense on the GNU.ORG domain, and he does not give people an option to comment on that page.

    I have asked Ludovic Courtès to enable comments on his political blog that he publishes on Guix operating system, yet he justified himself that they have no option to enable comments on that blog. Pardon me. Hacker of the operating system that has no option to enable comments?!

    The disgraceful statement gives impression that all GNU maintainers including the GNU project is against RMS, which is absolutely not true.

    So Ludovic Courtès could not answer “which behavior over the years undermined a core value of GNU project to empower all computer users”.

    Ludovic Courtès could not provide any fact supporting his general statement.

    He mentioned abort() joke, and Emacs virgins. One big X$%*&#X LOL!

    Thus RMS is made guilty of thoughtcrime, harassed, and defamed on his own website GNU.org on the subdomain guix.gnu.org by his own project maintainer.

    Yes, it is true that GNU.org domain belongs to FSF and FSF is organization, but those are legal matters. Legal entity is legal entity in the legal world. In the world of people, both the foundation FSF and GNU.org are creations of Dr. Richard Stallman, and are thus HIS OWN. It does not matter how he has organized the system of people and made legal entities to protect his creations. This does not matter. The domain is his own and it probably existed before the FSF was founded.

    To publish his political opinions where Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Richard Stallman on his own domain is disgraceful and shameful activity!

    That would be like me to kick my own mother in her stomach.

    I do not mind what they are speaking and what is somebody speaking or thinking bad about RMS, me, or anybody else. Everybody is entitled to their opinion.

    They are participating in rumour based ruination of his character.

    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink

    Attachments

    1. Joint statement on the GNU Project — 2019 — Blog — GNU Guix
      Blog posts about GNU Guix.
    2. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  20. louis (louis@pleroma.gnusocial.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Oct-2019 08:00:36 UTC louis louis
    Remote profile options...

    https://gnu.support/richard-stallman/Ludovic-Courtès-Guix-is-accusing-Stallman-of-Thoughtcrime-on-his-own-domain-GNU-org.html

    #gnu #rms PLEASE DEFEND RMS!

    In conversation about a year ago from pleroma.gnusocial.club permalink

    Attachments

    1. Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime on his own domain GNU.org
      from GNU Support
      Ludovic Courtès (Guix) is accusing Stallman of Thoughtcrime. By using the same platform that was provided to him by chief gnuissance Dr. Richard Stallman, the subdomain guix.gnu.org on gnu.org domain, Ludovic Courtès is defaming and harassing Stallman for reasons of thoughtcrime (see the book 1984). By that same act Ludovic Courtès abuses Guix code of conduct and kind communication guidelines as set in the community. Hatred, animosity and separation are products of Ludovic Courtès in October 2019.
  • Before

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 1.0
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU Social Club is a social network, courtesy of GNU.Support. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.0-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 All GNU Social Club content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.